The Duo does everything the Kross does — the crosshair laser is identical — and adds a layer that the Kross cannot provide: an objective, recorded measurement of what actually happened during the session.
Every movement is captured as angular data across all three planes. Active range of motion is measured and stored. Joint position error is calculated automatically rather than read from a chart. Session results are held in the companion application, where they can be compared against previous sessions, reviewed by other clinicians, or exported for reporting. Over time, this builds a longitudinal picture of how a patient's head and neck control is changing — a picture based on data rather than clinical impression.
This matters in a growing number of contexts. Concussion management increasingly requires documented, objective evidence of cervical function. Return-to-performance decisions carry real consequences and are easier to defend when they rest on data. Medico-legal cases, multi-disciplinary team settings, and research environments all benefit from a session record that is reproducible and auditable. The Duo provides that record without changing the clinical workflow that clinicians are already familiar with from the Kross.
Duo works particularly well when:
You need to show change, not just observe it. There is a meaningful clinical difference between noting that a patient's movement looks better and being able to show that their JPET error has reduced from 6.2° to 2.8° over eight weeks, or that their active rotation has increased by 14° since the first session. The Duo makes the second statement possible.
Complex or high-stakes cases require documentation. In post-concussion care, return-to-sport assessments, or cases with medico-legal dimensions, objective records carry weight that observation cannot. The Duo produces a session-by-session data trail that can be reviewed, shared with colleagues, or presented as evidence of clinical progress.
You are working in sport, military, or performance environments. High-performance settings demand precision. Baseline profiling, post-incident assessment, and return-to-performance comparison all benefit from the ability to capture and compare exact movement data across time points. Subtle deficits that are invisible to observation are detectable in the data.
Research or service evaluation is part of your work. The Duo generates exportable session data that can be used in outcome analysis, service audits, or research projects. For clinicians contributing to the evidence base in cervical rehabilitation or sensorimotor assessment, this is a practical operational difference.
You want JPET to be automatic. With the Kross, JPET requires reading the laser position from the target chart at the end of each trial and recording the result manually. With the Duo, angular error is captured and calculated automatically throughout the repositioning task, removing rater variability and reducing assessment time.